Some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are a number of people who assert learning language is constructive, while others who hold an opponent’s view. I am inclined to believe that acquiring a new language in early childhood is advantageous. In this essay, I elucidate my point of view by discussing the reasons before deducing a reasonable conclusion.
There are several reasons why learning a language at early age is advantageous. Firstly, it is argued that the children’s mind is enthusiastic to explore the new things in more intuitive and enjoyable way. This may be attributed to the fact that kids have an innate ability to acquire the rules of any language, which could disappear by adulthood. Specifically, a research study conducted by Yale university in 2014 has found that children are not able to realize the difference between their mother's language and other languages, therefore, they are more likely to achieve native-like pronunciation in their childhood.
In addition, it is believed that there is a clear link between culture and language acquisition. This is to say that learning a language would help children to easily embrace the culture of that language, therefore, their enthusiasm and self-confidence will amplified, which consequently instills a strong feeling of self-esteem in them to interact with the other pupils. For example, a bilingual Iranian kid, who is surrounded by American children in the schools, may not face an uphill struggle to communicate with the other pupils. As these examples illustrate, the benefits of learning language in childhood is obvious and people’s future will be constructively and enormously affected.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the new that learning language at early age could stimulate the youngsters in positive way, which catalyzes the surge of learning something new and they can easily be adapted to the new culture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-22 | mirzaasif88 | 55 | view |
| 2018-07-11 | SB83 | 72 | view |
| 2018-04-21 | masi1397 | 80 | view |
| 2018-04-21 | masi1397 | 11 | view |
| 2018-03-20 | sasikumarkbt | 77 | view |
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news & awareness and for some it acts like a companion. What is your opinion? 88
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Company’s top level authorities should get their Employees in decision-making process. Discus Organizations involve employees in decision making process of their products and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both. 77
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. And whether you support them or not. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ike pronunciation in their childhood. In addition, it is believed that there i...
^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'amplify'
Suggestion: amplify
...eir enthusiasm and self-confidence will amplified, which consequently instills a strong f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onstructively and enormously affected. In conclusion, the foregoing discussion ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41077441077 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21335977646 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552188552189 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.501253121 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.916666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153370573497 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587752540598 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386773011769 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09454272361 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180312727518 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.