Obesity has been linked to excessive sugar consumption. Some people believe that sugary drinks should be taxed to dissuade people from drinking them while others think that a tax is unnecessary and that public education is the best way to decrease sugar consumption.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Write between 200 and 300 words.
Recently, obesity has become the most serious health issue which is mainly caused by over consumption of sugar. It is considered by many that by placing high taxation on sugary drinks may refrain the people from drinking it, albeit others tend to think that public awareness is an efficient way to alleviate its consumption. This essay will argue the reasons why both public awareness and high taxation will help in diminishing the sugar consumption.
Putting high taxation on sugary drinks can prove to be worthwhile. When governments will apply the tax rate on such drinks containing high level of sugar in it, the purchasing demand for such drinks will automatically decelerate. For instance, consumers will think twice while purchasing sugary drinks with high taxation rate. Hence, placing tax on sugary drinks will be beneficial in decreasing the sugar consumption among people.
In contrast, for those who hold the notion that public awareness in this context will help people reducing their sugar consumption could be true as well. By making people educated towards the repercussions of sugar consumption which leads to obesity also in all age group people, they might stop over consuming it. Thus, by knowing the cons of such drinks, people will start avoiding it by keeping in mind their health benefits first.
This essay has argued how placing tax on sugary drinks and by educating people about the hidden pitfalls of such drinks can decelerate the consumption of sugar among people. In my way of opinion, I strongly believe that making people aware about the negatives of sugary drinks is the more efficient way to reduce the sugar consumption than by placing tax onto it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-03 | Carol Yuen | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | Agustinaac | 77 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | IreshaLakmali | 80 | view |
| 2018-09-22 | mirzaasif88 | 70 | view |
| 2018-06-01 | jyotikumari042 | 75 | view |
- "Brands that offer discounts and sales dilute their reputation and value."Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. 55
- In urban areas, harmful motor vehicle emissions are responsible for anywhere between 50 and 90 percent of air pollution. Motor vehicles emit a number of pollutants- the most damaging to human health is particulate matter, a combination of organic material 65
- "It is usually foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established in a good job".Do you agree or disagree? 80
- The advantages of the spread of English as a global language will continue to outweigh its disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Discuss why you chose that position. 77
- Some people believe that laws change human behavior.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with examples. 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, may, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1155234657 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57491085449 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516245487365 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7570716427 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.083333333 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378908537979 0.242375264174 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155133448303 0.0925447433944 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757172676543 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244049636903 0.151781067708 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580278702055 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.