Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
Recently, phenomenon of video communication with doctor for helping patients has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Pros and Cons of video communication with doctor?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the medical perspective standpoint, curing patients are bound up inextricably with hospital, which indicates they lead to both prescribed drug and patient examination. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between direct communication and illness diagnosis as well as an exponential increase in cure duration. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of remote communication is correlated positively with not only professional doctors but also individual's fault.
Within the realm of technology, without the slightest doubt, video communication attribute to health center, in that it would come down to misleading information, health worker, and detailed symptoms. As salient example of such attribution is severe illness, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take hospitalization for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint inadequate information about illness problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to chronic illness, psychological effects, and even drug side effects. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of skilled physician and direct examination.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the drawbacks of video communication with doctor are far outweigh its benefits. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-04-18 | zjaved | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | Ahmed145 | 85 | view |
- benefits and problems of studying and performing the old play in high school. 11
- The mass media including TV, radio, and newspaper can influence in young generation life. What is your opinion? 77
- With technology speeding up, more and more young people begin to use mobile phones and the Internet, but old people have little chance to be exposed to them. What ways could mobile phone and the Internet be useful to old people? How can old people be enco 88
- Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by the human? 88
- In many countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the medical perspective standpoint,...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...octors but also individuals fault. Within the realm of technology, without ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... physician and direct examination. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1207.87684729 147% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9397993311 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29494077538 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66889632107 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0337800869 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.615384615 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262518593089 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690619116361 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103420894728 0.071462118173 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157022705295 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105445922289 0.0609392437508 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.