Television has changed the quality of life for the ordinary person. Do you agree or disagree?
Television has become an integral part of today's life. Earlier, television was considered a luxurious item but now it can be found in every household. Some masses believe that it has improved the standard of life of a common man. I am in consummate discord with the argument. I think, it has more negative effects which I will elaborate in the subsequent paragraphs along with the examples.
To commence with. the most prominent demerit of watching television is it affects the mindset of children.they are continuously engaged with this electronic equipment and forget to study and eat on time which hinders their physical and mental growth. Which is very dangerous for their future. To exemplify, a survey revealed that excessive use of television has an adverse effect on minors and there living standard has declined as compared to the past. Thus, the use of this visual box is not beneficial for youngsters.
Furthermore, it has huge negative impact on relations between the family members. As people are obsessed with this box of entertainment they often ignore their near and dear ones. Which has widened the distance among relatives. For instance, in a scientific research, it was proved that individuals who watch television more that 5 hours a day have communication issues with their family members. Therefore, it has negative effects on family bonding.
To recapitulate, television was invented for the betterment of human kind but wrong usage has made it very harmful. There should be a time limit defined and people should use it wisely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-25 | elham mousavi | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-20 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-30 | elham mousavi | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-21 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- People spend a lot of money on various things as they earn more money nowadays than before Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Some people think that foreign visitors should be charged more than locals when they visit cultural and tourist attractions in a country To what extent do you agree with this view 61
- More and more companies are allowing employees to work at home Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- Throughout history people have dreamed about perfect society but they have not agreed what an ideal society is What do you think the most important elements to have perfect society in the modern world How people can achieve an ideal society 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t paragraphs along with the examples. To commence with. the most prominent dem...
^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...h the examples. To commence with. the most prominent demerit of watching tele...
^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ly members. As people are obsessed with this box of entertainment they often ignore ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... often ignore their near and dear ones. Which has widened the distance among relative...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12156862745 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85573678809 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592156862745 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1002186247 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8235294118 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76470588235 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11305240451 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350219014277 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389665960254 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699357436682 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198647835761 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.