Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
The statement seems to favor a judgement from an expert over an opinion from a layperson. Yet, the benefit lays in each suggestion may not be able to evaluate so easily simply from who gives it.
Suggestions comes from experts are no doubt a treasure in every field since they are the one who devote most in the specific fields and have more comprehensive viewpoints than most of the laypersons. During childhood, we learned from our parents of how behave properly. Grown adults are kind of experts to children for their much experience. In school, we learned from teachers and professors who specialized in their field with lots of study and paper at hand. Knowledge are built from basic to advanced, so the more experienced one often possesses the ability to figure out our questions right away. Therefore, their judgments are unquestionable valuable to us.
However, to value a suggestion given by an expert is one thing. To look down on the judgment from a person out of that field is another thing. Some detractors may think that the opinions are useless because those people in other field do not even understand any detail and the complexity of the questions they are facing. In fact, many unprecedented ideas show up in a totally unrelated situation. For instance, birds act as science experts to hint on Wright brothers when they found themselves stuck in the technological predicament. Then they realized that if birds could fly, human could copy their design and likewise be able to fly. After carefully observed how the bird's wings adapt to the blowing wind, they created the first airplane and changed the world.
Furthermore, over the history, it is obvious that many huge progresses are made because of the cooperation of people from a variety of fields. For example, people are crazy about iphone is not only because their user friendly interface, but also their beautiful outlook and fashion design. Holding a phone is no longer to communicate only, but to pursue a trendy belief and a social status. For sure, Steve Jobs cannot make Apple become such a telephone empire alone. The specialist from art, design, advertising and technology all contributed to this Apple legacy. In this era, it is obsolete to focus on one single profession, and hence the judgments from other fields are of great importance as well.
In the final analysis, we should appreciate judgments comes from anyone, no matter an expert or a nobody.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | barcelona433 | 83 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Zahid6400 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | wopona8219 | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview It is time for the city of Grandview to stop funding the Grandview Symphony Orchestra It is true that the symphony struggled financially for many years but last year private 78
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Relannian newspaper Industry analysts report that the number of dairy farms in Relanna has increasedby 25 percent over the last decade Also recent innovations in milking technology make it possible for 65
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment 50
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 66
- Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant decrease from prior years in expenditures for dormitory and classroom space mo 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, likewise, look, may, so, then, therefore, well, another thing, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95145631068 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66881266354 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592233009709 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6166199902 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7272727273 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.59090909091 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291876385339 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764629516986 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765590642449 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161982296986 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450635547339 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.